The Limitations and Capabilities of LLMs in Coding
A realistic and balanced look at what LLMs are currently good at in the context of software development and where their inherent limitations require human intervention and expertise. Addresses common misconceptions.
Key Points:
- Capabilities: Generating boilerplate code, writing simple functions, translating code between languages, suggesting syntax, refactoring small code blocks, writing initial drafts of tests, explaining code snippets.
- Limitations: Difficulty with complex algorithms, making architectural decisions, understanding the nuances of large, unfamiliar codebases, guaranteeing functional correctness or security, creative problem-solving beyond training patterns, handling ambiguous or incomplete specifications effectively without human clarification.
- The problem of “hallucination” – generating plausible-looking but incorrect or non-existent code/APIs.
- The critical and irreplaceable need for human oversight, review, and domain expertise.
- Callout (Inline Misconception): “Common Misconception: LLMs can replace architects or senior engineers. They are tools that augment, not replace, human expertise.”
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.